The composition of the editorial board of the journal «Bulletin KEU: economics, philosophy, pedagogy, jurisprudence»:

1) Aimagambetov Erkara Balkaraevich [Aimagambetov Erkara], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan), chairman;
2) Taubayev Ayapbergen Aldanaevich [Taubayev Ayapbergen], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan); vice-chairman;
3) Nakipova Gulmira Nikolaevna [Nakipova Gulmira], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan);
4) Manuel Fernandez-Grela [Manuel Fernandez-Grela], doctor PhD, [economics], University of Santiago de Compostela, (Spain);
5) Shelomentsev Andrei [Shelomentsev Andrei], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia);
6) Bazilevich Victor [Bazilevich Victor], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ukraine);
7) Satubaldin Sagyndyk Satybaldyevich [Satubaldin Sagyndyk], academician of NAS RK, doctor of economic sciences, professor, [economics] (Kazakhstan);
8) Alimbaev Abilda Amirkhanovich [Alimbaev Abilda], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Research Institute of Regional Development (Kazakhstan);
9) Azarov Vladimir Alexandrovich [Azarov Vladimir], Doctor of Law, Professor, [Jurisprudence], Omsk Regional Branch of the Russian Academy of Legal Sciences (Russia);
10) Pavel Anatolyevich [Pokrytan Paul], doctor of economic sciences, professor, [economics], Moscow State University named after MV Lomonosov (Russia);
11) Sikhimbayev Muratbai Rydikbaevich [Sikhimbayev Muratbay], Doctor of Economics, Professor, [Economics], Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan);
12) Khanov Talgat Akhmatzievich [Khanov Talgat], Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, [jurisprudence], Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan);
13) Shamurzaev Taalaibek Tursunovich [Shamurzaev Taalaibek], Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, [jurisprudence], Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University (Kyrgyzstan);
14) Bakishev Kairat Alikhanovich [Bakishev Kairat], Doctor of Law, Professor, [jurisprudence], Research Institute of Economic and Legal Research Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan);
15) Mulikova Saltanat Altayevna [Mulikova Saltanat], doctor of pedagogical sciences, professor, [pedagogy], Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Kazakhstan);
16) Karipbaev Bayzhol Iskakovich [Karipbaev Bayzhol], Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, [Philosophy], Karaganda State University named after E.A. Buketova (Kazakhsta

POSITION
on the procedure for reviewing articles,
received by the editorial office of the journal «Bulletin KEU»

1. Reviewing manuscripts of scientific articles in the editorial office of the journal “Bulletin KEU” is carried out to maintain a high scientific and theoretical level of publication and in order to select the most valuable and relevant scientific papers.
2. Peer review (peer review) is carried out by at least 2 independent experts from among the most respected scientists who collaborate with the editorial staff of the journal, but who are not members of the editorial board.
3. The review process is organized by the executive secretary.
4. The editors keep track of the passage of the peer-reviewed manuscripts.
5. After the author submits the article, it is checked for compliance with the basic requirements for the design of the publication (technical editor).
6. If the article meets all the requirements, two independent reviewers who are not members of the editorial board are appointed (in accordance with the scientific direction in which the article was written). Reviewing the materials submitted to the editorial office of the journal “Bulletin KEU” is carried out in compliance with confidentiality.
7. In articles sent for review, the surname and place of work of the author are not indicated (anonymous).
8. The reviewer must submit an expert opinion within the time period agreed with the editors, but usually within 2-3 weeks.
9. Based on the submitted reviews, the conclusion is made: “Reject the article” (rejection), “Editing is required”, “The article has been accepted for publication”.
10. Then the technical editor sends by email information about the necessary changes, or a decision.
11. If a decision is made on the need for additional editing of the article, the author is informed of the time frame by which the article should be amended, according to the recommendations of the reviewer. If the author makes the necessary changes within the indicated period, the article goes through the technical editor and reviewers again. Then again a decision is made.
12. In the event that the author does not agree with these comments and refuses to amend the article, the article is not published. The decision on the advisability of publication after review is made by the editor-in-chief. In most cases, the editorial board communicates its decision to the authors within 3-4 weeks. However, a number of factors (such as the availability of reviewers) may influence this period.

Annex 1

SAMPLE REVIEW FORM SUBMITTED TO THE REVIEWER

Please rate the article by the following parameters
 (mark X in the desired column)

Commentary if necessary: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Recommendations: (please mark the necessary with an X)

Signature of Reviewer ________________________ /........................../

"______" _________________ 200__ 

Editorial Board’s Ethics:
• The editorial board of the journal “KEU Bulletin” in its work is guided by the principles developed by the international association “Committee on Publication Ethics” (COPE), and adheres to a policy of ethical behavior requirements by authors and reviewers.
• Received for publication, but unpublished manuscripts and articles cannot be used by the members of editorial board for personal purposes;
• The editors of the journal are aimed to suppress all forms of unethical behavior both on their part and on the part of authors and reviewers.
• The editors of the journal do not allow publish articles rejected by reviewers as inappropriate scientific and ethical publications.
• The editorial staff of the journal compulsorily considers all official claims submitted to the journal’s editorial board.
• Editorial board’s work is based on the principles of courtesy, transparency, honesty and objectivity.

Author ethics:
• The authors are fully responsible for the selection and reliability of the facts, quotes, economic and statistical data, proper names, geographical names and other information, as well as for the use of data not intended for open printing.
• Actual data, all information borrowed from scientific literature and other sources, as well as citations given in the article, must be confirmed by appropriate links.
• Authors are fully responsible for the originality of the paper provided. Representation of plagiarism as an original work and publication of a previously published articles are not permissible. Plagiarism is any borrowing of someone else’s text without quoting, as well as paraphrasing and borrowing ideas (research results) without reference to the author.
• The authors of the publication should be all the scientists who contributed to the research. All authors of the publication are equally responsible for its content.

Reviewer Ethics:
• Only an independent scientist with a sufficient level of professional competence in the peer-reviewed field of science (topic, question, problem) and not a member of the editorial board of the journal can act as a reviewer.
• The reviewer acts as an independent expert deciding whether the publication complies with the requirements of science and copyright ethics.
• The manuscript submitted for review is a confidential document and falls under copyright law, and therefore cannot be used by the reviewer to discuss it with third parties (with the exception of members of the editorial board) or for personal purposes.
• If the reviewer considers himself (herself) insufficiently competent or biased with respect to the content (the author’s point of view on the problem) of the reviewed article, he (she) should refuse to review it.
• Articles submitted for review should not contain any personal information about its authors in order to avoid bias in terms of discrepancy of ethnic, religious, social or other qualities of authors and reviewer, not directly related to the content of the work.

Requirements for submission:
Please submit all manuscripts to the Editorial Board in Word documents by e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Master and Bachelor students should attach:
- a scanned version of the scientific Supervisor's recommendation for manuscript submission.

• a scanned version of the review from the specialist in this area of research. The review should contain reviewer's scientific degree and contact information (for teaching staff, scientific researchers working in educational and research institutions in Kazakhstan, and other countries).

Format:
• Text editor - Microsoft Word;
• Times New Roman, 11 point font (for the main text);
• Single line spacing;
• Margins: head, bottom, right, left - 2 cm;
• Indention - 1 cm
The volume of manuscripts in the specified format should not exceed 8 pages.

Obligatory elements:
• the universal decimal classification index, which should reflect the research area of publication in details; indention; Times New Roman 11 point font;
• the name (in capital letters) and the surname of the author (co-authors) (in capital letters) in the Russian, Kazakh and English languages, Times New Roman 10 point font, italic;
• information about the authors: regalia, institution and contact information (in Russian, Kazakh and English), Times New Roman 10 point font, italic;
• manuscript title must be in capital letters, bold type (in Russian, Kazakh and English), Times New Roman 11 point font, later indention;
• manuscript's abstract and key words must be in Russian, Kazakh and English, Times New Roman 10 point font.

Please, pay attention that abbreviations must be in the original language (in other language formats full transcript should be given).

Recommended structure:
1. Problem statement.
2. Analysis of the recent research and publications.
3. Selection of the unsolved aspects of the problem.
4. Purpose of the study.
5. Main results.

See example (in Russian, Kazakh and English)

Requirements for references

Reference to the literature should be given in square brackets, followed by a comma, not a capital "p" point and page number.

See example of references.
"According to the analysis of the plans on thematic areas and plans of departments, draft plan for the next planning period should be made" [22, p.34].

Requirements for illustrations, diagrams and figures

All figures should have the title and, if necessary, descriptive information (caption text Times New Roman 10 point font); references on all figures should be given in the text of manuscript. The word "Figure" and its ordinal number, the title and descriptive information should be directly under the picture. Figures should be numbered in Arabic numerals and have continuous numbering, Times New Roman 10 point font. If you have only one figure, it should not be numbered.
Drawings, graphs, charts, diagrams, illustrations, which are placed in a manuscript, should meet state standards.
All illustrations, diagrams and figures should be just black and white and they should be attached to the text.

See example of illustrations, diagrams and figures style

Note - Compiled by the author according to [5, 9, 12]

Figure 7 – Expenditures on health care in Kazakhstan

Requirements for tables' style

All tables should have a title (Times New Roman 10 point font) and the references in the text of manuscript. The title should reflect the content and should be accurate, concise and placed above the table.
The table should be placed directly after the paragraph in which it is mentioned for the first time. A table with a large number of rows can be transferred to another page.
Column headings are usually typed parallel to rows in the table; if necessary they can be perpendicular. The data in the table: Times New Roman 10 point font.
All tables should be attached to the text.

See example of table's style

Table 1 – Labor productivity data in the mining and manufacturing industries in Kazakhstan

Reference style

The list of references should include the following:
• Author (last name and initials in italics) - (Bendina N.V.)
• The name of the source, without quotation marks with a capital letter - (Marketing (lecture notes): A Handbook for the exam preparation. -). Then you should point a dot, hyphen. After the hyphen you should indicate the city. Put a colon ":", publishing house, after a comma you can type a year of publication (- M: Pryor, 2000).
• After a point, and the hyphen you should indicate the number of pages and put the letter "p" and point (123 p.)
In the process of periodicals registration you should indicate:
• Author (surname and initials)
• Title of the article, without the quotation marks with capital letters, two oblique lines / /
• The name of the source (magazine, newspaper) with capital letters, and later you can put a dot and hyphen.
• Year of issue (dot, hyphen), № (dot, hyphen), followed by the page the information (P.1 -127.)
References are indicated according to their citation in a manuscript. Times New Roman 10 point font.

See example of references style

1. Tatarkin A.I. Region economics on its stabilization way / under the redaction of A.I.. Tatarkin. – Ekaterinburg: IEUrO RAN, 2002. – 444 p.
2. Puzankov D.V.., Ryabov V.Ph., Mamontov A.N. System of strategic planning at the university // University management: practice and analysis. – 2002. – № 2 (21). – P. 27-36.
3. Law the Republic of Kazakhstan from the 19-th of January 2011 № 395-IV 3RK «On Nazarbayev university status», «Nazarbayev intellectual schools» and «Nazarbayev Fund». – Access mode: http://www.kazpravda.kz/_pdf/jan11/260111.